Talk:Alaska Airlines

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alaska Airlines article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

Alaska Airlines was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 2, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed
September 30, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
October 13, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airline project.

This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as High-importance).

Alaska High‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Alaska Destination Tables

These need to be split into three sections because of Alaska mainline Alaska horizon and Alaska SkyWest. Lucthedog2 (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Alaska Airlines

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article relies excessively on references to primary sources and have several uncited statements. Real4jyy (talk) 02:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Honolulu as an Alaska hub

I have a question about including Honolulu as a hub here on the Alaska Airlines page and on the Honolulu airport page. Yes, the Alaska Air Group has acquired Hawaiian Airlines and they are planning to merge all or at least most of its operations. But the two are (and are planned to remain) separate brands.

First, if you look at the Lufthansa page, the infobox lists Frankfurt and Munich as hubs. A footnote notes that, while the airline officially counts Berlin, Düsseldorf, Vienna, and Zurich among its hubs as well, they are not listed there because they are the hubs of its subsidiaries (Eurowings, Austrian, Swiss) and not of Lufthansa proper. In other words, they may be wholly owned subsidiaries but they are separate brands.

Second, on the Daniel K. Inouye International Airport page, listing both Hawaiian Airlines and Alaska Airlines in the infobox under "Hub for" seems redundant. It is a hub for Hawaiian. Please share your thoughts. Thanks. Precision123 (talk) 18:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone provide a reliable source saying that Honolulu is a hub for Alaska Airlines? RickyCourtney (talk) 00:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's all the focus on short-shelf-life content and editing activity which caused this article to become unstable and subsequently delisted as a GA. You're all over the revision history as a primary culprit. Why don't you explain why you believe it's appropriate to keep pushing the article in this direction? I scanned a bunch of Talking Totem issues, but feel it's a waste of my time to upload the images to Commons if they're not going to be used appropriately. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 15:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @RadioKaos, who are you referring to and can you describe what you mean? Thanks. --Precision123 (talk) 17:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies section

First off I think it is ridiculous that controversies sections are a discouraged section type. How can you have a balanced view of a topic or subject if you don't learn about controversies? Also the source is reliable because I pulled it directly from the website of the law firm that sued Alaskan Airlines, and there is plenty of documentation on their website and in their files to prove it if you actually clicked the link. If you want to remove it simply because it is a controversy section, then you are undermining the purpose of wikipedia, which is to provide a balanced view of topics and inform the reader with many diverse perspectives from all around the world. Mccoyjacob22565 (talk) 13:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]