Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.

Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.

How to use this page

[edit]
  1. Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
  2. Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
  3. Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
  4. Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
  5. Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
    1. Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
    2. If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
  6. Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
    1. Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
  7. Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
  8. Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
  9. Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.

Special notes

[edit]

Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.

Discussion for Today

[edit]
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025_March_30


March 30

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

Category:Monsters

[edit]
Propose merging both Category:Legendary monsters and Category:Mythological monsters together into Category:Monsters
My reasoning: Honestly, there's just way too much overlap between these three categories. All of them are mostly about folkloric/legendary/mythical monsters that didn't originate from modern works of fiction. We only really need one category to cover them all, the other two subcategories are just too redundant. AHI-3000 (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Odisha State Film Awards

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Eponymous category with no content at all besides the eponym. This appears to be left over from an earlier time when we had a significant number of separate articles about individual categories presented by these awards, but they've all long since been redirected to the head article for lack of sourcing, so that the head article is all that's left. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if categories start actually getting spun back out to standalone articles again, but it isn't necessary to retain this for just one article. Bearcat (talk) 19:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1267 in Shanghai

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Isolated category. Not useful for navigation. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Holy See heads of mission who did not attend the Pontifical Ecclesiastical Academy

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: WP:NONDEF. Not attending this Catholic institution is not a defining characteristic of these people. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Holidays

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: split, a holiday may mean an observance day, but holidays may also mean vacation. This category contains a mix of both. Split according to the two meanings and convert Holidays to a disambiguation page. This nomination is inspired by an earlier comment by User:Jc37. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal events

[edit]
subcategories of Category:Seasonal events by country
Subcategories of Category:Autumn events by country
Subcategories of Category:Spring (season) events by country
Subcategories of Category:Summer events by country
Subcategories of Category:Winter events by country
Nominator's rationale: "Events" just means anything that occurred. Not a necessary distinction. Merge/rename seasonal events to the respective season categories. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Rename/merge per nom. In most cases the observances are, or should be, also in a month category such as Category:February observances. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 15:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Categories by event

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: merge, a "Category:Categories by" is only useful when there are a lot of subcategories, but that is not the case here. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:11, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Skanör

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Category with just two entries. Lost in Quebec (talk) 11:22, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]